通讯：用消费“拉满”市场信心的北疆内蒙古******
中新网呼和浩特1月12日电 题： 用消费“拉满”市场信心的北疆内蒙古
中新网记者李爱平
兔年春节的脚步越来越近，中国北疆内蒙古自治区正在谋划用消费“拉满”市场信心。
12日，在此间召开的内蒙古自治区十四届人大一次会议上，内蒙古自治区主席王莉霞表示，必须把恢复和扩大消费摆在优先位置，当务之急是让商业街、步行街、大商场、小商铺都开起来、旺起来……”
记者近日走访内蒙古多地发现，随着春节临近，民众在做好个人防护的前提下，已纷纷前往商场、超市购物，很多人轿车后备厢都堆着满满的年货。
在内蒙古首府城市呼和浩特，连日来，随着购物热潮的降临，大街上甚至出现了交通拥堵。市民李德说，“这才是城市应有的样子。”
近期内蒙古在提振消费过程中，除了购物外，多地举行的各类冰雪活动也“拉满”了这个冬天的激情。
稍早前，呼和浩特官方就对外宣布了今冬要把冬季旅游与春节、元宵节等传统节日相结合，推出3大主题40多项内容丰富、形式多样的冬季文化旅游体育系列活动。
在提振消费层面，内蒙古官方正在出台一系列举措。
内蒙古自治区十四届人大一次会议透露，内蒙古今年将规划建设一批消费集聚区、体验中心和城郊大仓，支持呼和浩特、包头、鄂尔多斯、赤峰、通辽建设消费中心城市，在盟市中心城区设立互贸进口商品展示店，大力发展潮流夜市、民生早市、城乡集市消费场景，积极招引国内外知名品牌开设首店、举办首发活动，力争新引进品牌首店100家。
除此外，今年内蒙古还将全力争取阿尔山国家级旅游度假区获批，全力创建莫尔格勒河、七星湖等5A级景区，培育敕勒川、康巴什、额济纳等8个文旅产业融合发展示范区，打造10条非遗特色精品旅游线路和一批非遗特色村镇街区。
内蒙古人大代表应洪巨表示，旅游也是内蒙古用消费“拉满”市场信心的最好方式。
“特别是像那达慕这样的活动要红红火火搞起来，用歌舞的海洋、乳肉的飘香、壮美的风光把天南海北的游客吸引过来，让内蒙古成为自驾游的首选地、露营游的佳选地、度假游的必选地、康养游的优选地。”王莉霞在作政府工作报告时如是表示。
“旅游是永远的朝阳产业，也是典型的消费经济，关键是把品质提起来、名气打出去、人气聚上来。”王莉霞介绍，今年，内蒙古要集中打造几个在全国叫得响、在市场立得住的景区，把最美的草原林海、沙漠瀚海、长河大湖、冰天雪地都做出产品、做成精品，创造更多文旅融合的看点、亮点、卖点，做到从东到西全域皆可游、春夏秋冬全年无淡季。
分析人士认为，用消费“拉满”市场信心的内蒙古，旅游经济必须浓墨重彩，扮演重要角色。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 金马彩票地图 |
